AVEIR™ LEADLESS
PACEMAKERS
The only leadless solutions that can provide therapy
for all common pacemaker indications1,2,3
AVEIR™ LEADLESS PACEMAKERS (LPs) ARE THE ONLY LEADLESS SOLUTIONS THAT CAN PROVIDE THERAPY FOR ALL COMMON PACEMAKER INDICATIONS1,2,3

AVEIR™ AR2 ATRIAL LEADLESS PACEMAKER (LP)
- Sinus node dysfunction (SND) and normal atrioventricular (AV) and intraventricular conduction systems
Compare the clinical performance of AVEIR AR2 Atrial LP vs dual-chamber transvenous pacemakers
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT:


TAILORED THERAPY FOR SND PATIENTS

INTRODUCING AAI(R)+VVI†: PROGRAMMING THAT PROVIDES LONGEVITY AND FLEXIBILITY10,18

Atrial pacing rate response + single chamber ventricular [AAI(R)+VVI†] mode establishes two independently programmable devices (AVEIR™ AR2 Atrial LP and AVEIR™ VR Ventricular LP)
- i2i™ communication is disabled, resulting in increased battery longevity for both devices
- Program the atrial device for primary support and the ventricular device to a backup rate
- Software update also includes increased pulse width programmability for better fine-tuning of pacing outputs
OVER 10 YEARS OF PROJECTED BATTERY LIFE FOR SND PATIENTS [AAI(R) AND AAI(R)+VVI†]1*
With AVEIR™ AR2 Atrial LP, Abbott advances leadless pacing therapy for better patient care.
- AAI(R) & AAI(R)+VVI† modes: Up to 12.4 years battery life redefines the standard for leadless pacing for treating SND patients1
- Dual-chamber DDD(R): ~8.6 years, comparable to transvenous pacemaker systems
| MODE** | ATRIAL PACING | PROJECTED ATRIAL DEVICE LONGEVITY (YEARS)1 |
|---|---|---|
| AAI(R), AAI(R)+VVI† | 100% | 12.4 |
| DDD(R)*** | 50% | 8.6 |
TV
TV
- AVEIR™ Leadless Pacemakers and Delivery Catheter IFU. ARTEN600361108.
- Micra‡ VR2 MC2VR01 IFU.
- Micra‡ AV2 MC2AVR1 IFU.
- Udo EO, Zuithoff NP, van Hemel NM, et al. Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: the FOLLOWPACE study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(5):728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.014.
- Cantillon DJ, Exner DV, Badie N, et al. Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(11):1296-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007.
- AVEIR Leadless Pacemakers and Delivery Catheter IFU. ARTEN600307044. ARTEN600350965.
- Cha YM, El-Chami MF, Liu CF, et al. 2026 HRS/AHA/APHRS/EHRA/IDSA/LAHRS/PACES/STS expert consensus statement update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2026;S1547-5271(26)02264-2. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.04.015.
- Boersma LV, El‑Chami M, Steinwender C, et al. Practical considerations, indications, and future perspectives for leadless and extravascular cardiac implantable electronic devices: a position paper by EHRA/HRS/LAHRS/APHRS. Europace. 2022;24(10):1691‑1708. doi:10.1093/europace/euac066.
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmias. Health Technology Guidance HTG770. Feb 25, 2026. Accessed June 16, 2026. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/htg770.
- AVEIR Leadless Pacemakers and Delivery Catheter IFU. ARTEN600175957; ARTEN600307044; ARTEN600361109.
- Nilsson KR Jr, Birgersdotter-Green U, Saleem-Talib S, et al. Leadless atrial versus transvenous pacing for sinus node dysfunction: 1-year outcomes from the leadless ARRIVE real-world study. Europace. 2026;28(4):euag072. doi: 10.1093/europace/euag072.
- Ip JE, Brady PA, Kroman AM, et al. Leadless Versus Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemakers: Real-World Evidence From AVEIR™ VR Coverage With Evidence Development Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(21):e042471. doi: 10.1161/JAHA. 125.042471.
- Lo M, Amin AK, Kowalski M, et al. Leadless Versus Transvenous Dual-Chamber Pacemakers: Real-World Evidence From AVEIR DR Coverage With Evidence Development Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2026;37(3):544-553. doi: 10.1111/jce.70255.
- Neuzil P, Exner DV, Knops RE, et al. Worldwide Chronic Retrieval Experience of Helix-Fixation Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(11):1111-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.094.
- Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2022 May 1;43(17):1651. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac075.
- Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):932-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.043. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):1014-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.046.
- Breeman KTN, Dijkshoorn LA, Wilde AAM, et al. Predicted Need for Atrial and Ventricular Pacing Per Indication Group in Patients With Dual-Chamber Pacemakers. Heart Lung Circ. 2023;32(5):629-637. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.02.007. Erratum in: Heart Lung Circ. 2024;33(2):e17. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.003.
- Ip JE, Cheung JW , Liu CF , et al. Maximizing battery longevity of leadless pacemaker systems by optimizing individualized programming. Heart Rhythm. 2026;23(2):e293-e294. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.10.021.
- Vogt ML, Kellmann T, Ihara Z. Patient’s lifetime budget impact of a leadless pacemaker compared to transvenous pacemakers in France. Poster presented at: European Heart Rhythm Association; April 12-14, 2026; Paris.